<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Carbon-Pros Analyst Blog</title>
      <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/</link>
      <description>Smart Grid Technology-Getting ahead of the curve</description>
      
      <managingEditor>James Brancheau</managingEditor>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:53:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2ysb5-20051201</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Houston, we&apos;ve had a problem</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you've been following my blog posts and progress on the book, &quot;Smart Grid: The Business and Technology Landscape,&quot; you might have noticed the lack of posts since October. The book has progressed greatly and is more than half complete. Part One has been reviewed and revised. The reason for my recent silence is that I have run into a health problem and it is taking all my attention. I will be writing again as time permits but for much of this quarter I won't be posting to the blog. I look forward to talking with you soon. --JCB</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/11/houston_weve_had_a_problem.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/11/houston_weve_had_a_problem.html</guid>
         <category>Personal</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:53:28 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) and </strong><strong>Meter Data Management (MDM)</strong> handle the greatly increased volume and complexity of meter data. AMI supports all phases of the meter-data life cycle from acquisition to provisioning to providing customers with usage information. Instead of monthly readings, AMI provides periodic readings around the clock. AMI must meet stringent requirements for data latency, persistence, and scalability of energy consumption data. AMI functions span both the IT data center and grid operations and is an important enabler of the smart grid.   </p><p>MDM applications support the loading, validation, editing, and estimation of meter data. Due to the very high volumes of data logged by smart meters (as often as 15 minute intervals), new MDM applications must achieve high levels of scalability. In the Austin Energy roll-out of 500,000 meters with 15 minute sampling, the annual storage requirement went up 10X to 200TB. This is roughly 400MB per meter per year. Pacific Gas &amp; Electric is sampling twice per day and is adding storage to accommodate 170MB per meter per year. </p> <p>Smart metering can aid utilities in optimizing revenue by providing alerts that detect idle usage and energy theft. Theft costs utilities about 1-3 percent of revenue or about $6 billion across the industry. Analytical functions can extract information from interval data and translate it into reports for trigger appropriate proactive actions. MDM may include functions such as:</p> <ul><li>Connections to meter systems  	</li><li>Meter data validation, estimation, 	and editing (VEE)  	</li><li>Error handling  	</li><li>Meter data access  	</li><li>Meter inventory management  	</li><li>Usage analytics</li><li>Information delivery to customer 	portals</li></ul>In terms of today's market, AMI/MDM are red hot. In its September 2009 Assessment Report, FERC estimates that there are 7.95 million advanced meters deployed in the U.S. Under their Business-as-Usual scenario FERC estimates there will be about 80 million smart meters  installed by 2019. Under their full-deployment scenario, FERC estimates there will be about 141 million installed by 2019. With the disclaimer that an accurate forecast was outside the scope of the assessment, FERC goes on to say that &ldquo;the partial deployment scenario is probably closer to what might actually occur.&rdquo; If so, that averages to about 7 million new smart meters per year for the ten years 2010-29. That's a lot of smart meters and even more data storage. <img width="16" height="16" border="0" align="absbottom" src="http://carbon-pros.com/favicon.ico" /><br /> 	 	 	 	 	 	  <p class="sdfootnote">Sources:<br />meter data volumes: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/News_Blogs_News/The-Coming-Smart-Grid-Data-Surge-1247.html">Smart Grid News</a><br />smart meter estimate: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/demand-response.pdf">FERC Aug-09 report on Demand Response</a> </p> <div id="sdfootnote1"> 	 </div> ]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/advanced_metering_infrastructure_ami.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/advanced_metering_infrastructure_ami.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Tech Smart: Scalability</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Scalability allows a system to be gracefully upgraded to process more transactions by adding new processors, devices, and storage. Google is the king of scalability. It indexes billions of web pages to support its search engine. It operates hundreds of thousands of servers worldwide and processes millions of search requests each day.   <p>Google refers to its architecture as a three-layer stack, most of which was developed in-house. At the top of the stack are Google software services such as search, advertising, email, maps, and many others. In the middle of the stack is their distributed system architecture. This includes the Google File System (GFS), a distributed storage system (Bigtable), and a programming model (MapReduce) to support parallel processing.  </p> <p>At the bottom of the stack are the hardware and OS. Google operates hundreds of thousands of machines in 30-40 data centers. Each machine uses a standard AMD/Intel x86 chipset running a customized version of Linux. Each server has its own 12-volt battery to supply power in case the main power supply goes down.  </p> <p>Google does not say how many servers they operate but observers have estimated that the power required for a half-million servers ranges upwards of 20 megawatts and would cost in the neighborhood of $2 million per month in electricity charges. Google has an obsessive focus on energy efficiency. Fortunately, they have recently started to share some of their knowledge with the rest of the world.  </p><p>If you wonder what this has to do with smart grid, it's simple. The smart grid needs to be architected for massive scalability with millions of devices including meters that transmit readings as often as every 15 minutes. This particular note will appear in the book as a sidebar relating to our discussion of enterprise application architectures. <img width="16" height="16" border="0" align="absbottom" src="http://carbon-pros.com/favicon.ico" /></p> <p>Sources: High Scalability, Wikipedia, and CNET<br /><a href="http://highscalability.com/google-architecture">http://highscalability.com/google-architecture</a> <br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_platform">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_platform</a> <br /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html">http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html</a>  </p>  ]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/tech_smart_scalability.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/tech_smart_scalability.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Smart Dispatch</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<em>Smart Dispatch</em><span style="font-weight: normal"> is a next-generation application designed for operating in the highly dynamic environments that will be supported by smart grid. </span><em>Dispatch</em> is a key function for for transmission operators who need to balance electrical supply and demand. In the past, a known mix of baseload, intermediate, and peaking plants could be counted on to supply power as determined by relatively stable demand forecasts. Integration of renewable power (variable supply) and demand response (controllable demand) requires dispatch systems to predict and deal with rapid changes in supply and demand. <em>Smart Dispatch</em> applications must incorporate many new sources of data including renewable forecasts (wind, sun), demand response capabilities, carbon constraints, and estimates for distributed generation and storage. These sources must be matched to a timeline providing the dispatch profile for any specified time frame (minutes, hours, or days). Smart dispatch will provide operators with a continually updated view of the supply and demand dynamics. Functions include:   <ul><li>Generation portfolio management</li><li>Multiple supply/demand scenarios</li><li>Integration with demand response  	</li><li>Integrated economic analysis with 	market pricing</li><li>Decision support tools</li></ul><p>Advanced capabilities such as these will be essential for managing the increased complexity of the smart grid's ability to integrate new ways for producing power and managing demand. It gives grid operators the forward-looking view required for making better decisions.</p><p>Sources: <a href="http://www.areva-td.com/solutions/US_1095_Energy%20Management%20Systems.html" target="_blank">Areva</a> ASPCON-09 paper by Cheung et al. 2009<br /> </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/smart_dispatch.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/smart_dispatch.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>In-Stream Tidal Power</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Compared with the renewable power potential of wind and solar, tidal and wave power is much less discussed. In parts of the seacoast with narrow channels and strong currents, tidal power has great potential. On open shorelines with major ocean swell, wave power has great potential. These marine technologies don't often make headlines because they are a decade behind wind and solar in basic research and  pilot testing. But we are seeing some progress. <br /></p><p><img width="261" hspace="2" height="217" border="0" align="right" src="http://Carbon-Pros.com/image/openhydro-tidalturbine.jpg" />Nova Scotia Power and its technology partner OpenHydro recently unveiled a 1-MW tidal turbine. It will be  deployed in the Bay of Fundy this fall as part of Nova Scotia&rsquo;s tidal power test facility. The Open-Centre Turbine was manufactured in Ireland by OpenHydro. The turbine will rest directly on the ocean floor using a subsea gravity base fabricated in Dartmouth by Cherubini Metal Works. </p><p>The 33-foot turbine will be deployed in the Minas Passage of the Bay of Fundy. Testing will last up to two years. Operational data will be collected and shared by Nova Scotia Power and OpenHydro to determine the environmental performance and future feasibility of tidal power in the Bay of Fundy. The testing will focus on the robustness of the turbine in the harsh environment of the Bay of Fundy, close monitoring of the environmental impacts of the turbine, and its energy production capabilities. </p><p>The Bay of Fundy sits on the northeast Atlantic coast of North America between New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Maine. It is significant for having one of the highest vertical tidal ranges in the world. This project is a big step forward from previous projects and proposals which mainly involve building a dam to hold back part of the bay and extracting power from water flowing through the sluice gates (similar to conventional hydro). Dams can severely disrupt the marine ecosystem, trapping fish and marine mammals. The OpenHydo project, by contrast will sit directly on the seabed floor. If the project reduces interference with the marine ecosystem, and it holds up in the icy currents of Fundy, it could move tidal power technology from the pilot stage into broader production.&nbsp;<img width="16" height="16" border="0" align="absbottom" src="http://carbon-pros.com/favicon.ico" /></p><p>Sources: <a href="http://www.openhydro.com/devNovaScotia.html" target="_blank">OpenHydro</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundy_tidal_energy" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>. <br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/instream_tidal_power.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/instream_tidal_power.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Energy Smart: Dynamic Line Ratings</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Among the new measurements identified by FERC in 2009 to optimize the transmission system are <em>dynamic line ratings (DLR)</em>. Sandy Aivaliotis of The Valley Group is a champion of this technology and shared his knowledge with us.   <p>DLR is best understood in comparison with <em>static line ratings</em> in which the capacity of a transmission line is determined based on worst-case assumptions of full sun, high air temperature, and no wind. Those factors reduce the capacity of a line because hotter lines are more likely to overheat when carry electricity at their rated capacity. If operators knew that clouds were blocking the sun, the weather was cool, and the wind was blowing, they could use the full capacity of the transmission line. It turns out that <em>line tension</em> is a robust predictor of the environmental factors affecting its capacity. The Valley Group produces the tension and environmental sensors along with the software to generate realtime capacity information for grid operators. The system uses data on average line temperature, sag, clearance, and a realtime rating-factor. The system interfaces with the operator's EMS/SCADA and is customized for the operator&rsquo;s requirements.  </p> <p>Dynamic line ratings improve system reliability, as they allow operators to make fewer corrections in system dispatch, while providing advance warnings of impending thermal/capacity problems. They save money by fully utilizing transmission assets. Aivaliotis says that operators can transmit up to 30% more power over 90% of the time. This extra capacity can be used to manage delays in line construction and management of the network during major system disruptions. DLRs are an enabling technology for more effective use of renewable energy. For example, wind farm production is often limited by transmission constraints. Production is highest when the wind is blowing. That same wind increases the capacity of the transmission system. DLR is the key to unlocking its full capacity.  <img width="16" height="16" border="0" align="absbottom" src="http://carbon-pros.com/favicon.ico" /></p>Source: <a href="http://www.nexans.us/eservice/US-en_US/navigate_206113/The_Valley_Group.html" target="_blank">The Valley Group</a><a href="http://www.nexans.us/US/2008/CaseStudy_NERC_Report_1.pdf" target="_blank"><br /></a>http://www.nexans.us/US/2008/CaseStudy_NERC_Report_1.pdf <a href="http://www.nexans.us/US/2009/CEA%2025FEB2009.pdf" target="_blank"><br /></a>http://www.nexans.us/US/2009/CEA%2025FEB2009.pdf]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/energy_smart_dynamic_line_ratings.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/energy_smart_dynamic_line_ratings.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Coal plants in transition</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>With carbon cap-and-trade on the horizon, utilities are looking into options for reducing their dependence on carbon-intensive coal for baseload power. Yesterday, the North Carolina Utilities Commission approved  Progress Energy's plan to build a new natural gas-fueled power plant to replace a coal-fired plant in 2013. </p><p>The plant will be almost At 950MWs, nearly the capacity of a nuclear power plant. It will use a high-efficiency combined-cycle technology and sit on the site of the retiring coal-fired plant. The new gas-fueled plant is expected to cost about $900 million and take two years to build. The plan also will involve the construction of a natural gas pipeline to the site. Progress Energy expects to announce a contract for the gas supply in the near future. </p><p>Progress Energy's plan contrasts with moving to next-generation nuclear plants for baseload power. The next generation of nuclear plants is expected to cost at least $6 billion each, take up to ten years to build, and provide about 1300MWs of capacity. <br /></p><p>If analysts are correct that North America has at least 100 years of non-conventional natural gas reserves, this strategy makes a lot of sense. Natural gas plants emit about half the carbon-dioxide as coal plants. High efficiency combined-cycle designs such as this one emit about one-third the carbon of the older coal plants they will replace. We may need next-gen nuclear plants as a bridge to the future when renewables can provide baseload power, but this model suggests that natural gas can also provide part of that bridge. Diversity in the U.S. fuel mix makes sense as a hedge against future uncertainties. <img width="16" height="16" border="0" align="absbottom" src="http://carbon-pros.com/favicon.ico" /></p><p>Source: <a href="http://www.energycentral.com/functional/news/news_detail.cfm?did=13536124" target="_blank">EnergyCentral</a>, <a href="http://progress-energy.com/aboutus/news/article.asp?id=22642" target="_blank">Progress Energy</a><br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/coal_plants_in_transition.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/coal_plants_in_transition.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:28:21 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Smart Grid Interoperability: GWAC Stack</title>
         <description><![CDATA[You can think of the smart grid as a similar to the Internet in that it is a loosely coupled system of systems. And like the Internet, a single, all- encompassing architecture is not practical. Instead the legacy grid provides the foundation on which we add several layers of communication networks and applications with many systems being connected in real time.   <p>Smart grid architecture will develop as a composite of many system and subsystem architectures. This will allow for maximum flexibility during implementation and will simplify interfacing with <img width="297" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="323" border="0" align="right" src="http://carbon-pros.com/image/GWAC-stack.jpg" />other systems. It also supports evolution of smart grid as new applications and technologies become feasible. <br /></p>  <p>To support the standards development process, the GridWise Architecture Council (GWAC) created an eight-layer model. The model illustrates the many levels of standards and technologies required to support end-to-end interoperability.  </p>  <p>As you can see in the figure, end-to-end interoperability involves everything from the electrical connections at the bottom of the stack to the regulatory environment at the top. Levels 1-2 involve standard connections across the myriad of grid components and communication networks. Levels 3-4 insure that the meaning of data and information remains intact as it flows across different elements. Levels 5-6-7 deal with the business and organizational issues of interconnected systems. Level 8 points to the need for a regulatory environment that does not impede the interoperability of systems.  </p><p>The <strong><em>GWAC Stack</em></strong> is a means to identify well-known interfaces. Unambiguous interfaces are essential to interoperability. This s demonstrated on the Internet which has a physical and data link layer that allows messages to cross any type of network (Ethernet, Wi-Fi, microwave, optical) and still be managed end-to-end by a common network layer. On the Internet, protocols such as TCP/IP handle the transport details making sure that data packets get to their destination correctly, while higher level protocols such as HTTP and XML structure the message so that it can be interpreted properly at each end of the network.  <img width="16" height="16" border="0" align="absbottom" src="http://carbon-pros.com/favicon.ico" /></p><p>Source: GWAC Interoperability Context, March 2008<br /><a href="http://www.gridwiseac.org/pdfs/interopframework_v1_1.pdf">http://www.gridwiseac.org/pdfs/interopframework_v1_1.pdf</a>&nbsp;   <br /></p>  ]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/smart_grid_interoperability_gwac_stack.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/10/smart_grid_interoperability_gwac_stack.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Off to GridWeek in Washington D.C.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It took all week but I managed to get the full draft of part one of the book to reviewers. I think it turned out pretty good, but I'll know a lot more once the reviews come in. Good writing is based on good ideas followed by a lot of editing. Strong reviewers, accepting authors, and detail-oriented editors make a great team. Thanks to those of you who volunteered to review Part One: Energy meets IT and Telecom. </p><p>Part Two of the book will get into smart grid architectural details. If you have deep technical expertise and are interested in reading a draft of part two, let me know. It should be ready by mid-October. </p><p>With any luck, I'll start filling the pages of this blog again next week. Thanks for hanging in there. --JCB</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/off_to_washington_dc.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/off_to_washington_dc.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Boulder SmartGridCity update</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Xcel Energy says that it has completed its infrastructure deployment for its project in Boulder, CO. To date, the it involves approximately 200 miles of new fiber optic cable, 4,600 residential and small business transformers, and 16,000 smart meters, 20 software applications, and 95 application interfaces. Software integration and testing continues. The Boulder implementation is the most comprehensive city-wide smart grid project in the U.S. Current functionality includes:<br /><ul><li>switching power through fully automated substations</li><li>re-routing power around bottlenecked lines</li><li>detecting power outages</li><li>proactively identifying outage risks</li><li>automating three of four distribution substations</li><li>automating four computer monitored power feeders</li><li>monitoring  23 feeders  for voltage irregularities</li></ul><p>A grid monitoring system, installed by CURRENT Group has helped avert four power outages  by alerting Xcel operators to transformers that were ready to fail. Not a bad start to Xcel's &quot;grid optimization&quot; efforts. </p><p>I live in Boulder and have applied to be a beta tester for Xcel's next phase of development which will include demand response programs, in-home displays, and other energy-saving devices. We'll see what happens. --JCB<br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/boulder_smartgridcity_update.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/boulder_smartgridcity_update.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:18:04 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Smart Grid Book, part one</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Greetings on a fine Friday afternoon! TGIF. I can now admit to being stuck in the Rocky Mountains the past week without  access to the internet. My trip was part work and part vacation. The vacation activity was hiking in the wilderness around Crested Butte Colorado. That area is pristine and spectacular. It was a great way to recharge my batteries. Hitting the hot springs on the drive home was icing on the cake. </p><p>My work activity was focused on finishing Part One of my book. I will have the first five chapters ready for reviewers during the coming week. If the editing goes smoothly, I will start posting to the blog again. My topical coverage will shift toward technical architecture, covering both networks and applications. The week of Sep 21, I am attending Grid Week in Washington D.C. My interviews there will be focused on Smart Grid architecture, the subject of the next two sections of the book. My blog posts that week will be opportunistic covering both product announcements and research findings. <br /></p><p>Let me know if you are attending Grid Week and would like to schedule a meeting. --JCB<br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/smart_grid_book_part_one.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/smart_grid_book_part_one.html</guid>
         <category>Personal</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Grid Interconnects</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The U.S. bulk power system has evolved into three major interconnected systems (power grids), within which regional transmission organizations and independent system operators exist to operate transmission systems. They also manage organized competitive markets for the purchase and sale of wholesale electricity. The major networks consist of extra-high-voltage connections between individual utilities designed to permit the transfer of electrical energy from one part of the network to another. These transfers are restricted, on occasion, because of a lack of contractual arrangements or because of limited transmission capability. The three networks are:   <ul><li>the Eastern Interconnected System, 		</li><li>the Western Interconnected System, 	and  	</li><li>the Texas Interconnected System.  	</li></ul> 	 	  <p>The Texas Interconnected System is not interconnected with the other two networks (except by certain direct current lines). The other two networks have limited interconnections to each other. Both the Western and the Texas Interconnect are linked with different parts of Mexico. The Eastern and Western Interconnects are completely integrated with most of Canada or have links to the Quebec Province power grid. Virtually all U.S. utilities are interconnected with at least one other utility by these three major grids. The exceptions are in Alaska and Hawaii. The bulk power system makes it possible for utilities to engage in wholesale (sales for resale) electric power trade. Wholesale trade has historically played an important role, allowing utilities to reduce power costs, increase power supply options, and improve reliability. Historically, most wholesale trade was between interconnected utilities within the continental United States.  With open access and deregulation of wholesale markets cross-border trade has become more prominent in meeting domestic electricity requirements. U.S. international trade is mostly imports. Normally, most imports are from Canada, with a small portion coming from Mexico.  </p><p>Source: Energy Information Administration (<a target="_blank" href="http://eia.doe.gov/">EIA</a>) </p> ]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/grid_interconnects.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/grid_interconnects.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:37:44 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Utility-Scale Energy Storage</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Today's large-scale storage solutions include pumped hydro, compressed air, ﬂywheels, sodium-sulfur batteries, supercapacitors, and ﬂow batteries. No matter what technology is used, the idea behind storage systems is to use low-cost off-peak power  to charge the system (store the power) and discharge the system (drawing on its stored power) during peak demand when more electricity is needed. Storage systems have the effect of smoothing out utility load profiles. <br /><p>While most storage systems remain very expensive, pumped hydro and compressed air are cost-effective today. Pumped hydro is well established and makes hydroelectric power one of the most dispatchable of all fuel sources. With a storage option, hydroelectric production can be turned up or down in minutes (<a href="http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/energy_smart_pumped_hydro.html">see post</a>). Compressed air energy storage (CAES) is in an earlier stage of development but is starting to see commercial pilots and deployments. Both have limitations in terms of location. Hydro needs a vertical drop and plenty of land for the storage reservoir. Compressed air needs favorable geological strata deep underground (<a href="http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/energy_smart_compressed_air_energy_storage_caes.html">see post</a>).  </p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in">The smart grid will provide the communication and software solutions to make large-scale storage systems work. Their charge and discharge cycles need to be tightly managed to match charging with periods of excess power and to match discharging with optimal periods of demand. In a dynamic pricing environment, this is no easy task.  </p> <p>Utility-scale storage is a natural match for utility-scale renewable generation.  </p> <p align="CENTER"><strong><div style="text-align: center"><img height="192" border="0" width="437" src="http://carbon-pros.com/image/caes-with-wind.png" /></div><br /> Wind Power with Integrated CAES</strong></p> <p>In the case of wind power, excess power generated when the wind is blowing (often at night, off-peak) can be used to charge any of these systems (CAES is illustrated above). An effective storage system can make wind dispatchable, greatly increasing its value to utilities. The combination of dynamic pricing and intermittent generation requires sophisticated modeling tools. To meet future needs, advanced wind forecast models are under development at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).  </p> <p>Utility-scale storage systems promise to increase <em>efficiency</em> by better matching supply with demand. They will increase <em>reliability</em> by smoothing out power fluctuations. And they will increase <em>stability</em> by providing ride-through during short power disruptions.  <img height="16" border="0" width="16" align="absbottom" src="http://carbon-pros.com/favicon.ico" /></p>  ]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/utilityscale_energy_storage.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/utilityscale_energy_storage.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Energy Smart: Pumped Hydro</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Pumped-hydro converts electricity into potential energy in the form of water stored at a high elevation. During &ldquo;charging,&rdquo; low-cost off-peak power is used to pump water from a lower elevation reservoir to a higher elevation. During discharging the elevated and stored water is released through turbines to convert the stored energy back into electricity. The turbines are reversible so they can be driven by falling water to generate electricity and then be used in reverse to pump the water back up. Although there are efficiency losses in the pumping process, the system pays for itself by selling electricity during periods of peak demand, when electricity prices are highest. Pumped storage is the largest-capacity form of grid energy storage now available.   <p><br /> </p> <p align="CENTER"><strong><img height="237" border="0" width="415" align="middle" src="http://carbon-pros.com/image/tva-pumped-storage.jpg" /></strong></p><p align="CENTER"><strong> Pumped Hydroelectric Storage</strong><br />Sources: Wikipedia, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)<br /><a href="http://www.tva.gov/power/pumpstorart.htm">http://www.tva.gov/power/pumpstorart.htm</a>  </p>  ]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/energy_smart_pumped_hydro.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/energy_smart_pumped_hydro.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Energy Smart: Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Like pumped hydro, CAES converts electricity into potential energy that can be drawn on when needed. During charging, off-peak, low-cost electricity is used to pump high-pressure air into an underground cavern such as a salt dome. The air is held under pressures between 1,000 and 1,500 pounds per square inch (PSI). By comparison, scuba tanks hold air at about 3,000 PSI. During discharging, plant operators bring air from the cavern back to the surface, where it is heated with natural gas, causing it to expand and rush through combustion turbines that power a generator. CAES in not solely a storage system. It is a hybrid technology that uses the compressed air to turbocharge a highly efficient natural gas turbine. The waste heat rate of a CAES plant is roughly half that of a traditional natural gas plant. The electricity created by the CAES generator can be delivered to customers at peak periods through the utility transmission and distribution network. <br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img height="316" border="0" width="417" src="http://carbon-pros.com/image/sandia-caes.jpg" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="center">Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES)<br />Source: Sandia National Laboratories</div><div align="center">http://www.sandia.gov/media/NewsRel/NR2001/norton.htm <br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/energy_smart_compressed_air_energy_storage_caes.html</link>
         <guid>http://carbon-pros.com/blog1/2009/09/energy_smart_compressed_air_energy_storage_caes.html</guid>
         <category>Business</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
